It's just not a problem that everyone has on their bullet list of criteria to choose a computer. I'd expect ThinkPads and other Wintel Laptops with better chipsets to be on par with apple, so yes, it's not a fair comparison. Never had a smartphone with as many problems as those cheap Lenovo laptops though. cheap Android smartphones) just suffered from bad signal reach / quality / channel negotiation. To be fair, the offending device was a dirt cheap Windows 10 "convertible"/tablet from 2016. Using Wifi lead to a full connection drop for BT or vice-versa. This is an extreme case, but I had similar problems with other devices, albeit not as extreme. Complaints about it are all over the web (E595, Ryzen 7 with 16GB RAM in my case) The one I was using shipped a very bad Wifi chip branded as Realtek. If I am not mistaken, the laptop causing most of my problems was a very cheap ThinkPad from the E-series, which is not quite comparable to other models of the TP line, even when buying one of the better / more expensive ones. but Ice Cube is only sending 10% of its data. It's better now (the South Pole does have a broadband link). > One terabyte of unfiltered data is collected daily and about 100 gigabytes are sent over satellite for analysis. > The recorded tapes are shipped to Berkeley, where we subdivide them into small work units on four splitter workstations. The entire sky survey is expected to require 1,100 tapes, for a total of 39 Tbytes of data. Each tape holds about 15.5 hours of data. > This 2.5-MHz band is recorded continuously onto 35 Gbyte DLT tapes using 2-bit complex samples. Arecibo does not have a broadband Internet connection, so data must go by postal mail to Berkeley. > Observational data were recorded on 2-terabyte SATA hard disk drives fed from the Arecibo Telescope in Puerto Rico, each holding about 2.5 days of observations, which were then sent to Berkeley. Consider the data connections from Arecibo or Ice Cube (which has many of the same problems).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |